Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 471 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Celeron G3930 - 270 vs 256 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $85.76 vs $98.02
- Up to 16% better value when playing F1 22 than Celeron G3930 - $0.32 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
270
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |