Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670T outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670T is 1488 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than EPYC 7551P - 177 vs 173 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670T - 64 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-4670T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670T | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | EPYC |
| Haswell | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
