Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Core i5-4200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 412 days newer than Core i5-4200U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4200U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160T - 15 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-4200U - 501 vs 475 FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4200U
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4200U | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
