Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4200U outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4200U is 5 days older than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4200U
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3250 - 173 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 15 vs 55 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
169
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5994 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4200U | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |