Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Core i5-3475S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1854 days newer than Core i5-3475S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3475S
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 5% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i5-3475S - 129 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3475S - 64 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3475S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3475S | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | EPYC |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
