Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3450 is 177 days older than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 16% better in Diablo IV than FX-8320 - 109 vs 94 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-3450 - $74.82 vs $95.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 8 vs 4 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77153 minutes ago
Buy for $74.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |