Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-3770S outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-3770S and the more expensive Core i5-3450 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3450 - 118 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i5-3450 - $79.5 vs $95.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3450 - $0.67 vs $0.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
117
99.15254237288136%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
82.71604938271605%
Price, $
$95
83%
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58289 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
118
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $79.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58288 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
603
90.13452914798206%
Multi-Core
1781
79.7224709042077%
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770S |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |