Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3360M outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3360M is 1854 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3360M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3360M - 64 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3360M
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3360M | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | EPYC |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
