Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Core i5-3350P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1760 days newer than Core i5-3350P.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3350P
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 69 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-3350P - 162 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3350P - 64 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3350P
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3350P | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | EPYC |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
