Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Core i5-3230M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1640 days newer than Core i5-3230M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3230M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Core i5-3230M - 264 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3230M - 64 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3230M | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | EPYC |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |