Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i5-2537M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1673 days newer than Core i5-2537M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2537M
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 17 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-2537M - 117 vs 113 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
117
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2537M | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |