Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i5-2537M vs Celeron G3900

Core i5-2537M vs Celeron G3900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i5-2537M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1673 days newer than Core i5-2537M.

Advantages of Intel Core i5-2537M

  • Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 17 vs 51 Watts

Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900

  • Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-2537M - 117 vs 113 FPS
This is a free version of Dying Light 2: Stay Human.
Dying Light 2: Stay Human

Dying Light 2: Stay Human

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High Quality Raytracing

Intel Core i5-2537M Logo
Core i5-2537M

Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011


FPS

113

96%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


FPS

117

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.34/FPS

100%

Price, $

$39.9

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)

Buy for $39.9 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 35 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High Quality Raytracing

Intel Core i5-2537M Logo
Core i5-2537M

Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i5-2537M Logo
Core i5-2537M

Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011


Single-Core

305

52%

Multi-Core

596

60%

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


Single-Core

581

100%

Multi-Core

992

100%

Intel Core i5-2537M Logo

Intel Core i5-2537M

vs
Intel Celeron G3900 Logo

Intel Celeron G3900

Feb 1st, 2011Release Date
Sep 1st, 2015
Core i5CollectionCeleron
Sandy BridgeCodenameSkylake
Intel BGA 1023SocketIntel Socket 1151
Mobile
Segment
Desktop
2Cores2
4
Threads2
1.4 GHzBase Clock Speed
2.8 GHz
2.3 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
17 W
TDP51 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
14.0xMultiplier
28.0x
Intel HD 3000Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 510
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.