Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i5-2430M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2559 days newer than Core i5-2430M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2430M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 13% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-2430M - 171 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2430M - 24 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2430M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |