Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 1587 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Fortnite than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 237 vs 223 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $109.99 vs $749.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i5-12400F - $0.49 vs $3.16 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
237
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.16/FPS
15%
Price, $
$749.99
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $749.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
223
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 225 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |