Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 4207 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 22% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-860 - 203 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $48.0 vs $140.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11600 - $0.29 vs $0.69 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4007 minutes ago
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4007 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |