Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2837 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 16% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i3-3250 - 221 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $56.34 vs $140.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i5-11600 - $0.3 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5245 minutes ago
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5245 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |