Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3284 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 19% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2420 - 196 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Xeon E5-2420
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2420 |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | May 14th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EN |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 1356 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
