Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 847 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-2420 - 124 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 85 vs 95 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2420
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
