Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is 2520 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Performs up to 2% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Xeon E5-2420 - 166 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E5-2420
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
