Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 4305 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 86% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-950 - 442 vs 237 FPS
- Up to 38% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-950 - $0.26 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $100.0 vs $115.99
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
442
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115.99
86%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i7-950 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |