Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2844 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-4670S - 163 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $43.88 vs $105.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-11400F - $0.28 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
43.07692307692308%
Price, $
$105.99
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $105.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
156
95.70552147239265%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $43.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1151
58.69454360020397%
Multi-Core
3254
42.770767613038906%
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |