Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2844 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i5-4670S - 253 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $55.26 vs $115.99
- Up to 48% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i5-11400F - $0.24 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
253
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
52%
Price, $
$115.99
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
227
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |