Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-7100T - 282 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $51.6 vs $115.99
- Up to 51% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-11400F - $0.2 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
282
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
48%
Price, $
$115.99
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4602 minutes ago
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4603 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |