Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 294 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G6900 - 369 vs 355 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $39.99 vs $104.75
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $104.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74306 minutes ago
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74305 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1603
81.74400815910249%
Multi-Core
2696
35.436382754994746%
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |