Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F and the cheaper Celeron G6900 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $74.79 vs $899.99
- Up to 89% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-12400F - $1.29 vs $11.69 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 33% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G6900 - 77 vs 58 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
58
75%
Value, $/FPS
$1.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $74.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |