Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3210 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 46% better in Rust than Celeron G550 - 220 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $49.0 vs $108.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-11400F - $0.32 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |