Buy on Amazon
$136.5
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 11% better in God of War than Celeron G3930T - 182 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - $39.0 vs $136.5
- Up to 68% better value when playing God of War than Core i5-11400 - $0.24 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Core™ i5-11400 Desktop Processor 2.6 GHz Cores up to 4.4 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for $136.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 373 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 372 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11400
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
