Key Differences
In short — Core i5-1135G7 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-1135G7 is 1161 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-1135G7
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than EPYC 7551P - 135 vs 122 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-1135G7 - 64 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-1135G7
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-1135G7 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | EPYC |
| Tiger Lake-U | Codename | Naples |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
