Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11320H outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11320H is 1453 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11320H
- Performs up to 7% better in Deathloop than EPYC 7551P - 184 vs 172 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11320H - 64 vs 8 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 21st, 2021
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11320H | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Jun 21st, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | EPYC |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Naples |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Iris XE 96EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |