Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 26% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 399 vs 316 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $81.39 vs $143.7
- Up to 28% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-10600K - $0.26 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
399
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
72%
Price, $
$143.7
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for $143.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7693 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
316
79%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7693 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |