Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 607 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $99.0 vs $139.99
- Up to 26% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i3-10320 - $0.43 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-9100T - 243 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
232
95.47325102880659%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2240 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
243
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
74.13793103448276%
Price, $
$139.99
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2242 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
78.16764132553607%
Multi-Core
3178
68.6986597492434%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |