Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7300 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7300 is 1590 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield V than FX-4130 - 234 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i3-7300 - $22.92 vs $98.55
- Up to 74% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i3-7300 - $0.11 vs $0.42 per FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $98.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |