Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Core i3-6320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 1703 days newer than Core i3-6320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6320
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 4% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i3-6320 - 122 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6320 - 12 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-6320
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6320 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
