Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 and the cheaper Pentium G4400 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than Pentium G4400 - 133 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Pentium G4400 - 51 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $26.99 vs $100.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-6100 - $0.21 vs $0.75 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel 3.70 GHz Core i3-6100 3M Cache Processor (BX80662I36100)
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1762 minutes ago
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
129
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4400 3.3GHz Dual-Core 2-Thread CPU Processor 3M 54W LGA 1151
Buy for $26.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1761 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Pentium |
| Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
