Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 10% better in Valorant than Core i3-3240T - 753 vs 683 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $25.7 vs $100.0
- Up to 69% better value when playing Valorant than Core i3-6100 - $0.04 vs $0.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel 3.70 GHz Core i3-6100 3M Cache Processor (BX80662I36100)
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14126 minutes ago
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
683
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3240T CPU Used 2-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 2.9 GHz 3M 35W LGA1155
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14125 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
