Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 945 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 10% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G4900 - 197 vs 179 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 51 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $53.55 vs $85.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-6100 - $0.3 vs $0.43 per FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
69.76744186046511%
Price, $
$85
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3979 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
179
90.86294416243655%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$53.55
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3981 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
51.59128978224455%
Multi-Core
1051
44.99143835616438%
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |