Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 3393 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $45.0 vs $56.99
- Up to 9% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-9100F - $0.3 vs $0.33 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 17% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-530 - 174 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-530 - 65 vs 73 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1914 minutes ago
Buy for $56.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1915 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-530 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |