Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 3008 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 34% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $45.0 vs $68.02
- Up to 32% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G4900 - $0.36 vs $0.53 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-530 - 129 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i3-530 - 54 vs 73 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2222 minutes ago
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2222 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-530 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Clarkdale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
73 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |