Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Core i3-5020U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 851 days newer than Core i3-5020U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-5020U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 2% better in New World than Core i3-5020U - 104 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-5020U - 64 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-5020U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-5020U | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | EPYC |
| Broadwell-U | Codename | Naples |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
