Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4370 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4370 is 1535 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $48.5 vs $706.27
- Up to 93% better value when playing Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.27 vs $3.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 24 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Buy for $706.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |