Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2990 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $48.5 vs $460.74
- Up to 88% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-13900K - $0.36 vs $3.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 12% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-4370 - 150 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 32 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
134
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.07/FPS
11%
Price, $
$460.74
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $460.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |