Buy on Amazon
$149.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4360 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4360 is 514 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4360
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Celeron G1610 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i3-4360 - $37.0 vs $149.88
- Up to 75% better value when playing Control than Core i3-4360 - $0.19 vs $0.75 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i3-4360 Processor (4M Cache, 3.70 GHz) BX80646I34360
Buy for $149.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7454 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7452 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-4360
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4360 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
