Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1218 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $48.1 vs $109.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing Resident Evil Village than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.16 vs $0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Resident Evil Village than Core i3-4350 - 298 vs 295 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4350 - 16 vs 4 threads
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $48.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
298
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
43%
Price, $
$109.99
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |