Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i3-4330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1858 days newer than Core i3-4330.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-4330 - 158 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4330 - 24 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$398.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $398.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2404 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
1066
83.6734693877551%
Multi-Core
2144
28.763080225382343%
Intel Core i3-4330 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |