Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 2135 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4330.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - $92.11 vs $395.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 9 3900X - $0.23 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-4330 - 428 vs 399 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4330 - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
399
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$92.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $92.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Buy for $395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4330 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |