Buy on Amazon
$19.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 407 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $19.99 vs $111.11
- Up to 80% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Core i7-6700T - $0.08 vs $0.41 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 0% better in Dishonored 2 than Core i3-4160 - 263 vs 262 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
262
99.61977186311786%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core I3-4160 Processor 3.60 GHz, 2-Core LGA1150 Socket, Hyper-Threading (BX80646I34160)
Buy for $19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
263
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
19.51219512195122%
Price, $
$111.11
17%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for $111.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
89.94082840236686%
Multi-Core
2072
58.104318564217614%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 54 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
