Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 1812 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4160 - 182 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7499 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |