Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2110 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $19.99 vs $97.18
- Up to 83% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-10400F - $0.02 vs $0.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Valorant than Core i3-4160 - 779 vs 740 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 12 vs 4 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
740
94.99358151476251%
Value, $/FPS
$0.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
779
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
16.666666666666668%
Price, $
$97.18
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $97.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
73.99165507649514%
Multi-Core
2072
36.02851677969049%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |