Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160 is 1948 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Athlon 3000G - 117 vs 116 FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Athlon |
| Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 54 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
