Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160 is 1722 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 268 vs 265 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160 - 15 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 54 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
