Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2805 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 29% better in War Thunder than Core i3-4150T - 192 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $49.99 vs $219.95
- Up to 82% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i3-4150T - $0.26 vs $1.48 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |