Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 1632 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - $219.95 vs $275.13
- Up to 13% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-9700K - $1.25 vs $1.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4150T - 193 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
176
91%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$219.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3851 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.43/FPS
87%
Price, $
$275.13
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for $275.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3851 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |